The following e-mail is from Jill
Rubin, Food Safety Advocate for MASSPIRG, and
is dated April 13, 2001:
We have two very exciting bills coming up in
the Massachusetts legislature. One will hold the
biotechnology companies liable for any harm that
comes from the use of GE foods and the other one
will place a five-year planting moratorium on
GE crops in Massachusetts.
These bills will be heard on Monday, April 23rd.
Please send in written testimony write to:
Joint Committee on Natural Resources and Agriculture
Room 473F
State House
Boston, MA 02133
We will also be having a rally behind the State
House at NOON on Monday, April 23rd to show our
support for protecting our health and environment
from genetically engineered foods. We will be
meeting in Ashburton Park behind the State House
Anex.
Please pass along the following action alert.
Thanks for your help!
Jill Rubin
Food Safety Advcate
MASSPIRG
29 Temple Place
Boston, MA 02111
jillrubin1@juno.com,
(617) 292-4800
TAKE ACTION!
Contact the Chair of the Natural Resources Committee
and voice your support for Legislation On Genetically
Engineered Foods
BACKGROUND:
GE foods may cause serious health and environmental
impacts. Despite these risks federal regulations
do not require pre-market testing or labeling
of GE foods. Here in Massachusetts, we have a
great opportunity to protect our health, our environment,
and our food supply through the liability and
planting moratorium bills filed in the State Legislature
this year.
LIABILITY BILL (HB 3385)
An Act Relative to the Liability of Genetically
Engineered Foods was filed in the House
and Senate. This bill will hold biotechnology
companies liable for any harm that comes from
the use of genetically engineered (GE) seeds or
hormones regardless of intent or negligence. The
House version, HB 3385, will be heard in the Joint
Committee on Natural Resources on April 23rd at
10:30 am.
TALKING POINTS
1. PURPOSE:
HB 3385 will encourage biotechnology companies
to be vigilant of safety concerns prior to commercializing
GE foods. In addition, by assigning liability
to the biotechnology companies, the public will
be able to recover damages due to the use of GE
foods.
2. RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS:
As the inventors and aggressive marketers of
GE food, biotechnology companies should be responsible
for damages that GE crops, seeds, and hormones
cause.
3. POTENTIAL TO CAUSE GREAT HARM:
·Food is a universal necessity. Anything
that can potentially threaten our food supply
poses a great risk to our health and safety; ·Impacts
of genetic engineering on our food are unpredictable.
For example, researchers found that that an insecticidal
protein used in genetic engineering binds to human
blood cells indicating it may cause immunological
damage;
·Our food supply can be contaminated in
a short period of time. For example, StarLink,
a GE corn never approved for human consumption,
accidentally entered our food supply. In just
three growing seasons, StarLink tainted 430 million
bushels of corn in the U.S. ·GE crops are
living organisms that can propagate and spread
in undesirable ways. For example, GE corn pollen
is known to blow up to 4 to 6 miles and reproduce
with conventional corn. Once non-GE crops are
contaminated, there is no turning back.
PLANTING MORATORIUM BILL (HB 2207)
An Act Relative To Planting Genetically
Modified Crops, HB 2207, will place a five-year
planting moratorium on GE crops in Massachusetts.
This bill will be heard in the Natural Resources
Committee along with HB 3385 on April 23rd.
TALKING POINTS
1. PURPOSE:
This bill ensures that we fully understand the
impacts of GE crops before we introduce them into
our environment.
2. HARM TO WILDLIFE. GE foods have the potential
to:
·Become invasive species. GE plants are
living organisms capable of reproduction and once
released they cannot be recalled.
·Cause unintended harm to wildlife. For
example, many GE crops produce their own pesticides
in every cell. Toxic pollen may travel by wind
or animals and harm surrounding wildlife.
3. RISKS TO FARMERS by:
·Contaminating non-GE crops. GE crops
do not observe farm boundaries and therefore threaten
surrounding farmers with contamination. This could
be especially financially devastating for organic
farmers who would lose their certification and
livelihood.
·Creating super-weeds that
are pesticide resistant and difficult to eliminate.
·Increasing the pace of pesticide resistance
in crop pests.
·Losing crop varieties. Farmers who save
their own seed a propagate unique crop varieties
may lose this ability due to cross pollination
with GE crops.
4. MARKETABILITY OF SAFE FOOD:
By enacting a five-year planting moratorium,
consumers in Massachusetts can be assured that
their local produce is free from the potential
dangers of genetically engineered food. A moratorium
will also provide the opportunity for Massachusettss
farmers to market their crops abroad and regionally
as GE free.
TAKE ACTION:
1. Contact the Chair of the Natural Resources
Committee and voice your support for HB 3385 and
HB 2207. E-mail/ call/ write: Senator Marc Pacheco,
Room 109C, State House, Boston, MA 02133; (617)722-1551,
mpacheco@senate.state.ma.us
2. Come to a rally behind the State House at
NOON on Monday, April 23rd to show your support
for protecting our health and environment from
genetically engineered foods. Meet in Ashburton
Park behind the State House Anex and bring your
friends.
Sample E-mail/ Letter:
Dear Senator Pacheco,
I am writing to urge you and the Natural Resources
Committee to pass favorably HB 2207 and HB 3385.
Both bills will help protect our health and our
environment from any harm that comes from genetically
engineered (GE) foods.
GE foods are being sold at our grocery stores
even though they have not been proven safe. GE
foods pose serious risks to human health and the
environment from causing unexpected allergies
to creating new toxins in our food. Anything that
can potentially harm our food supply is a great
risk to our health and safety and should be strongly
regulated.
HB 3385 will encourage biotechnology companies
to ensure that GE foods are safe before they are
marketed by holding them liable for any harm that
comes from their use. This bill will also allow
the public to recover damages that are caused
by GE foods.
Currently, few genetically altered crops are
grown in Massachusetts. However, GE crops have
been planted all over the Midwest. Midwest farmers
who do not to grow GE crops are having difficulty
protecting the integrity of their non-GE crops
and contamination has led to financial losses.
We can still avoid this situation in Massachusetts.
Furthermore, GE crops are living organisms capable
of reproduction and once released into the environment
they cannot be recalled. We can protect Massachusetts
environment and farmers by passing HB 2207 and
placing a five-year moratorium on GE crops.
Once again, I strongly encourage you and the
committee to support HB 2207 and HB 3385. Thank
you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Your Name
Address
Phone Number
For More Information Contact:
Jill Rubin
Food Safety Advocate
MASSPIRG
(617) 292-4800
jillrubin1@juno.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Number: MA01RHD 2842 Filed: 12/ 6/ 0
Author: Hodgkins, Christopher
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In the Year Two Thousand and One
An Act Relative To The Liability For Genetically
Engineered Food
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
in General Court assembled, and by the authority
of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. The General Court finds and declares:
(1) Genetic engineering artificially transfers
genes at the cellular and molecular level between
species that could never naturally breed and is
therefore, qualitatively different from traditional,
selective breeding;
(2) Genetic engineering can be used to produce
new versions of virtually all plants and animals
used for food. Thus, within a short time, the
Massachusetts's food supply could consist almost
entirely of genetically engineered products;
(3) This conversion from a food supply based
on selective breeding to one based on organisms
produced through genetic engineering could be
one of the most important changes in the food
supply in this century;
(4) Genetically engineered food presents new
issues of safety that have not been adequately
studied. Some of these suspected risks include
decreasing antibiotic effectiveness in treating
common diseases and harming untargeted species;
(5) Many of the potential effects of genetically
engineered food are unpredictable and longterm.
(6) The biotechnology companies that invent and
manufacture genetically engineered food are the
scientific experts concerning this technology;
(7) The burden of ensuring environmental and
human health safety should be placed on the biotechnology
companies.
SECTION II.
Section 1 of chapter 94 of the General Laws as
appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby
amended by adding the following definitions:-
(a) "Genetically engineered" means:-
(1) An organism that has been altered at the
molecular or cellular level by means that are
not possible under natural conditions or processes
(including recombinant DNA and RNA techniques,
cell fusion, microencapsulation, macroencapsulation,
gene deletion and doubling, introduction of foreign
genes, and a process that changes the positions
of genes), other than means consisting exclusively
of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization,
in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture; or
(2) The offspring of an altered organism, if
the offspring possesses any of the changed molecular
or cellular characteristics of the parent.
(b) "Genetically engineered food" means
items for human consumption that contain or were
produced using seeds or hormones that consist
wholly or partly of genetically engineered organisms.
(c) "Person" means a natural person,
corporation, partnership, or other business unit.
(d) "Strict liability" means absolute
liability for any damages that result from the
use of genetically engineered organisms without
respect to intention or negligence.
(e) "Crop contamination" means any
transfer of genetic material from a genetically
engineered growing crop, by cross pollination
or other means, to a nongenetically engineered
growing crop; provided, however, that the farmer
that grows non-genetically engineered crops does
not also grow genetically engineered crops.
(f) "Farmer" means a person, partnership,
limited liability company, association, corporation,
cooperative, trust, sharecropper, or other business
unit, device, or arrangement who, as either a
landowner or a tenant, is engaged in growing agricultural
crops or agriculture products including dairy
production.
SECTION III.
Chapter 94 of the General Laws as appearing in
the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby amended by
adding the following sections after section 328:-
Be it enacted by the General Court of Massachusetts:
Section 329:
(A) Any person who genetically engineers organisms
for their use as food, including seeds, hormones
and other products, shall be strictly liable in
tort for damages caused by the use of their products;
provided, however, that the harm was not a result
of another person violating reasonable safety
precautions that were outlined in a signed agreement
by both persons. The damages shall include but
are not limited to:
(1) Human health effects including but not limited
to:
(a) Allergies resulting from added proteins,
including proteins not found in the food supply;
(b) Exposure to toxic proteins or other substances
added to genetically engineered food or caused
by the effects of genetic engineering;
(c) Nutritional loss due to cellular changes;
and
(d) A decrease in antibiotic resistance because
of the spread of antibiotic resistance genes that
are used during genetic engineering;
(2) Environmental harm including but not limited
to:
(a) Death or injury to nontargeted plants, animals,
and other species;
(b) Soil destruction; and
(c) The spreading of plants or insects resistant
to pesticides through unintended gene transfer;
(3) Crop contamination including but not limited
to:
(a) Loss of any price premium which would have
accrued to a farmer of nongenetically engineered
products by contract or other marketing arrangement,
or which would have been otherwise reasonably
available to the farmer through ordinary commercial
channels;
(b) Any additional transportation, storage, handling,
or related charges or costs incurred by the farmer
which would not have been incurred in the absence
of crop contamination; and
(c) Any judgment, charge, or penalty for which
the farmer of non genetically engineered products
is liable due to breach of contract including
loss of organic certification, for failure to
deliver a crop free of genetically engineered
material or for delivering a crop exceeding any
contractually agreed tolerances for the presence
of genetically engineered material.
(B) Any aggrieved person may bring action in
the appropriate court against any person that
causes harm under this act.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Number: MA01RHB 2201
Author: Rachel M. Kaprielian
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In the Year Two Thousand and One
AN ACT To Amend The Agriculture And Markets Law,
In Relation To Genetically Modified Crops.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
in General Court assembled, and by the authority
of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Section __ Article __ of the agriculture
and markets law, as renumbered by chapter of the
laws of , is renumbered article ___ and a new
article is added to read as follows:
ARTICLE_
GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS
SECTION 400. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.
401. DEFINITIONS.
402. PLANTING OF CROPS.
403. MARKETING PLAN.
Section 400. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS. THE LEGISLATURE
FINDS THAT GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS POSE RISKS
OF UNKNOWN DIMENSION TO HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT,
AND THAT DRAMATIC INCREASES IN THE PLANTING AND
CONSUMPTION OF SUCH CROPS OVER THE PAST SEVERAL
YEARS HAVE FAR OUTPACED OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR
IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS. FURTHERMORE,
BECAUSE THE EXCHANGE OF GENETIC MATERIAL BETWEEN
GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS AND CONVENTIONAL CROPS,
WILD PLANTS, AND ORGANISMS IS KNOWN TO OCCUR,
GENETICALLY MODIFIED MATERIAL AND ANY ADVERSE
CHARACTERISTICS IT CONFERS OR PROMOTES CAN BE
IRREVOCABLY DISPERSED INTO THE WIDER ENVIRONMENT.
THE LIST OF POTENTIAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN INCLUDES
BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:
THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSECT AND WEED RESISTANCE
TO PESTICIDES; INJURY OR DEATH OF NON-TARGET SPECIES;
CROP LOSS FROM SEEDS THAT DO NOT YIELD AS EXPECTED
OR THAT PRODUCE CROPS WITH UNEXPECTED CHARACTERISTICS;
AND ALLERGENICITY,
TOXICITY, OR DECREASED NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF GENETICALLY
MODIFIED CROPS. THE LEGISLATURE FURTHER FINDS
THAT FOODS PRODUCED FROM GENETICALLY MODIFIED
CROPS ARE INCREASINGLY BEING REJECTED BY DISTRIBUTORS,
PROCESSORS, RETAILERS AND CONSUMERS ALIKE IN BOTH
DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MARKETS. THE GROWTH
OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MASSACHUSETTS
THUS PLACES ALL STATE FARMERS AT RISK IN THE MARKETPLACE.
THOSE WHO INTENTIONALLY PLANT GENETICALLY MODIFIED
CROPS AND KNOWINGLY ACCEPT THE MARKETPLACE RISK
ALSO PLACE AT RISK THOSE WHO PLANT CONVENTIONAL
AND ORGANIC CROPS, WHICH CAN BE UNINTENTIONALLY
CONTAMINATED BY GENETICALLY
MODIFIED CROPS. A MORATORIUM ON THE PLANTING
AND GROWING OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MASSACHUSETTS
WILL ENHANCE THE VALUE AND PROTECT THE REPUTATION
OF MASSACHUSETTS' AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, CONFERRING
A SIGNIFICANT MARKETING ADVANTAGE WHILE PRESERVING
THE STATE'S ECOLOGICAL HEALTH. FOR THESE REASONS,
THE LEGISLATURE ENACTS A SUSPENSION OF THE PLANTING
AND GROWING OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS IN MASSACHUSETTS
Section 401. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS ARTICLE
"GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS" SHALL MEAN
CROPS PRODUCED FROM PLANT VARIETIES CREATED USING
TECHNIQUES THAT ALTER THE MOLECULAR OR CELL BIOLOGY
OF AN ORGANISM BY MEANS THAT ARE NOT POSSIBLE
UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS OR PROCESSES. GENETIC
MODIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE RECOMBINANT DNA, CELL
FUSION, MICRO- AND MACRO-ENCAPSULATION, GENE DELETION
AND DOUBLING, INTRODUCTION OF A FOREIGN GENE,
AND GENE REPOSITIONING.
IT SHALL NOT INCLUDE CROP BREEDING, CONJUGATION,
FERMENTATION, HYBRIDIZATION, AND TISSUE CULTURE.
Section 402. PLANTING OF CROPS. NO GENETICALLY
MODIFIED CROPS MAY BE PLANTED OR GROWN IN THE
STATE FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS ARTICLE.
Section 403. MARKETING PLAN. THE DEPARTMENT OF
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SHALL PREPARE A MARKETING
PLAN THAT USES THIS ACT AS A PROMOTIONAL TOOL
FOR MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Number: MA01RHB 3252 Filed: 12/ 6/ 0
Author: Polito, Karyn E.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In the Year Two Thousand and One
AN ACT RELATIVE TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
in General Court assembled, and by the authority
of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 1 of chapter 94 of the General
Laws as appearing in the 1998 Official Edition,
is hereby amended by inserting the following:-
For the purpose of this act, the following phrases
shall have the following meanings:-
(a) "Genetically engineered" shall
mean
(1) An organism that has been altered at the
molecular or cellular level by means that are
not possible under natural conditions or processes
(including recombinant DNA and RNA techniques,
cell fusion, microencapsulation, macroencapsulation,
gene deleti and doubling, introduction of foreign
genes, and a process that changes the positions
of genes), other than means consisting exclusively
of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization,
in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture; or
(2) The offspring of an altered organism, if
the offspring possesses any of the changed molecular
or cellular characteristics of the parent.
(b) "Genetically engineered food" means
items for human consumption that contain or were
produced using seeds or hormones that consist
wholly or partly of genetically engineered organisms.
SECTION 2. Chapter 94 of the General Laws as
appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby
amended by adding the following sections after
section 328:-
Section 329: Any person or corporation who utilizes
genetically engineered organisms in the production
of food products for use and sale, including,
but not limited to, seeds, hormones, produce,
fresh or processed food products and foodstuffs
and other products for consumption, shall conspicuously
label said products with a label indicating the
presence of genetically modified organisms as
either a component for production or ingredient
in said product. The following shall be acceptable
notification:
THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS A GENETICALLY ENGINEERED
MATERIAL, OR WAS PRODUCED WITH A GENETICALLY ENGINEERED
MATERIAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Number: MA01RSB 1789 Filed: 12/ 6/ 0
Author: Joyce, Brian A.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In the Year Two Thousand and One
AN ACT RELATIVE TO THE LIABILITY FOR GENETICALLY
ENGINEERED FOOD.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
in General Court assembled, and by the authority
of the same, as follows:
SECTION I.
The General Court finds and declares:
(1) Genetic engineering artificially transfers
genes at the cellular and molecular level between
species that could never naturally breed and is
therefore, qualitatively different from traditional,
selective breeding;
(2) Genetic engineering can be used to produce
new versions of virtually all plants and animals
used for food. Thus, within a short time, the
Massachusetts's food supply could consist almost
entirely of genetically engineered products;
(3) This conversion from a food supply based
on selective breeding to one based on organisms
produced through genetic engineering could be
one of the most important changes in the food
supply in this century;
(4) Genetically engineered food presents new
issues of safety that have not been adequately
studied. Some of these suspected risks include
decreasing antibiotic effectiveness in treating
common diseases and harming untargeted species;
(5) Many of the potential effects of genetically
engineered food are unpredictable and long-term.
(6) The biotechnology companies that invent and
manufacture genetically engineered food are the
scientific experts concerning this technology;
(7) The burden of ensuring environmental and
human health safety should be placed on the biotechnology
companies.
SECTION II.
Section 1 of chapter 94 of the General Laws as
appearing in the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby
amended by adding the following definitions:-
(a) "Genetically engineered" means-
(1) An organism that has been altered at the
molecular or cellular level by means that are
not possible under natural conditions or processes
(including recombinant DNA and RNA techniques,
cell fusion, microencapsulation, macroencapsulation,
gene deletion and doubling, introduction of foreign
genes, and a process that changes the positions
of genes), other than means consisting exclusively
of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization,
in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture; or
(2) The offspring of an altered organism, if
the offspring possesses any of the changed molecular
or cellular characteristics of the parent.
(b). "Genetically engineered food"
means items for human consumption that contain
or were produced using seeds or hormones that
consist wholly or partly of genetically engineered
organisms.
(c) "Person" means a natural person,
corporation, partnership, or other business unit.
(d) "Strict liability" means absolute
liability for any damages that result from the
use of genetically engineered organisms without
respect to intention or negligence.
(e) "Crop contamination" means any
transfer of genetic material from a genetically
engineered growing crop, by cross pollination
or other means, to a non-genetically engineered
growing crop; provided, however, that the farmer
that grows non-genetically engineered crops does
not also grow genetically engineered crops.
(f) "Farmer" means a person, partnership,
limited liability company, association, corporation,
cooperative, trust, sharecropper, or other business
unit, device, or arrangement who, as either a
landowner or a tenant, is engaged in growing agricultural
crops or agriculture products including dairy
production.
SECTION III.
Chapter 94 of the General Laws as appearing in
the 1998 Official Edition, is hereby amended by
adding the following sections after section 328:-
Be it enacted by the General Court of Massachusetts:
Section 329:
(A) Any person who genetically engineers organisms
for their use as food, including seeds, hormones
and other products, shall be strictly liable in
tort for damages caused by the use of their products;
provided, however, that the harm was not a result
of another person violating reasonable safety
precautions that were outlined in a signed agreement
by both persons. The damages shall include but
are not limited to:
(1) Human health effects including but not limited
to:
(a) Allergies resulting from added proteins,
including proteins not found in the food supply;
(b) Exposure to toxic proteins or other substances
added to genetically engineered food or caused
by the effects of genetic engineering;
(c) Nutritional loss due to cellular changes;
and
(d) A decrease in antibiotic resistance because
of the spread of antibiotic resistance genes that
are used during genetic engineering;
(2) Environmental harm including but not limited
to:
(a) Death or injury to non-targeted plants, animals,
and other species;
(b) Soil destruction; and
(c) The spreading of plants or insects resistant
to pesticides through unintended gene transfer;
(3) Crop contamination including but not limited
to:
(a) Loss of any price premium which would have
accrued to a farmer of non-genetically engineered
products by contract or other marketing arrangement,
or which would have been otherwise reasonably
available to the farmer through ordinary commercial
channels;
(b) Any additional transportation, storage, handling,
or related charges or costs incurred by the farmer
which would not have been incurred in the absence
of crop contamination; and
(c) Any judgment, charge, or penalty for which
the farmer of non-genetically engineered products
is liable due to breach of contract including
loss of organic certification, for failure to
deliver a crop free of genetically engineered
material or for delivering a crop exceeding any
contractually agreed tolerances for the presence
of genetically engineered material.
(B) Any aggrieved person may bring action in
the appropriate court against any person that
causes harm under this act.
|