|
November
headlines
Return
to November article index
Growing
clamor for biotech food safety
Case
of engineered corn is having wide impact
November
20
San Jose Mercury News
Last July, Larry Bohlen bought $200 worth of yellow
corn products from a Safeway in Silver Spring, Md.,
filling his shopping cart with corn chips, taco shells and
tostadas, muffin mix, corn flakes and TV enchilada
dinners.
But Bohlen was no ordinary shopper. As director of health
and environmental programs at the non-profit Friends of
the Earth in the nation's capital, he was looking for
evidence that a genetically engineered variety of corn
called StarLink, approved for animal feed and ethanol
production but not human consumption, had entered the food
supply.
He found exactly what he set out for, a trace of
StarLink DNA in one of the products he had tested -- Kraft
Food's Taco Bell Home Originals taco shells, the first of
hundreds of products that have been recalled as a result
of Bohlen's discovery.
What began as a shopping expedition to a suburban
supermarket has shaken the agricultural biotechnology
industry to its roots, by raising serious doubts about a
regulatory scheme intended to protect the public from
inadvertent consequences of genetically engineered crops.
As a result of the contamination, opponents of such
genetic crops believe that American consumers will realize
the potential dangers of a new technology that has quietly
transformed American agriculture.
Already, Bohlen's discovery has had its impact. Aventis
S.A., under pressure from the government, has pulled its
StarLink seeds from the market and agreed to buy up this
fall's StarLink corn crop. The company on Wednesday
announced that it will spin off its agrochemicals
business, which developed the controversial StarLink, but
officials noted that the move was planned long before the
recalls.
Grain elevator operators are now routinely testing for
StarLink contamination; mills have been shut down to clean
out possible traces of contaminated corn; and companies
that purchased suspect grain, including Mission Foods
Corp., one of the biggest producers of taco chips and
tortillas in the world, have shifted to white corn because
no varieties on the market are genetically modified.
Even the biotech industry itself has now joined the
clamor for reform -- urging the Food and Drug
Administration to make food safety reviews for biotech
crops mandatory and complaining that the Environmental
Protection Agency should never have allowed a grain on the
market for animal feed that was not also approved for
human food.
Later this month, a scientific advisory panel to the
EPA is scheduled to consider whether StarLink can be
consumed safely over the next few years.
More testing
Bohlen says that his group will continue testing for
contamination in products that remain on grocery shelves.
``It's unsettling that it's come to this,'' he said in
a recent interview. ``This corn contamination crisis is
pivotal in determining whether any of these genetically
engineered crops will ever be marketed.''
Aventis officials say that they expect no health impact
from the small amount of StarLink that has found its way
into the food supply. The company has ``taken
unprecedented voluntary action to successfully contain
StarLink corn on the farm and channel, under USDA
supervision, to approved uses,'' a spokeswoman said.
The biotech industry sees the incident as slowing but
not halting the introduction of new genetically engineered
agricultural products.
It's ``a speed bump,'' said Carl B. Feldbaum, president
of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, a trade group
based in Washington, D.C. ``I think the regulatory problem
needs to be addressed,'' he said. ``It does not appear to
be a public health problem. Opponents of biotechnology
have used it as a threat to public health, but the fact is
no one sneezed.''
Nonetheless, Feldbaum added: ``The EPA should never,
ever been asked for or granted approval only for animal
use.'' StarLink is the only product that gained such
partial approval.
Move to avoid
further recalls
Feldbaum's group is backing a petition by Aventis, one
of its member companies, to have StarLink temporarily
declared safe for human consumption -- a move that would
avoid further food recalls and unsnarl grain shipments in
the farm belt. It would also reduce the company's
financial exposure, which already may run into the tens of
millions of dollars.
But critics object to approving the product
retroactively.
``We see this as an attempt by Aventis to evade
liability,'' said Jane Rissler, a senior staff scientist
at the Union of Concerned Scientists, a non-profit group
known for advocating international arms control. ``They've
broken the law, and they want to get out from under the
consequences of breaking the law.''
Aventis claims that new evidence shows that the amount
of StarLink is ``many thousands of times smaller than that
required to sensitize individuals and lead to a later
allergic reaction.''
At issue is whether a natural pesticide added to
StarLink, a protein called Cry9C, might cause food
allergies in some people.
In a lengthy document submitted to federal regulators
late last month, company scientists argued that the
StarLink protein is unlike most known food allergens and
that the amount of that protein in any individual's diet
will be too small to have an effect.
``The EPA has confirmed that the risk of allergic
reaction to food containing StarLink in people, if any, is
extremely low,'' said the Aventis spokeswoman, quoting
from an agency press release.
She noted that over the last three years StarLink
represented only a fraction of 1 percent of all the corn
produced in the United States. And most of that crop goes
into animal feed.
StarLink is one of several yellow corn varieties
genetically engineered to produce natural pesticides,
proteins found in a common soil bacterium, Bacillus
thuringiensis or ``Bt.'' For 40 years, farmers have
been spraying the microbe on crops as an alternative to
using chemical insecticides.
Biotech scientists were able to pluck out the genes
that carry the instructions for producing these proteins
from different strains of Bt and splice them into the
genetic machinery of corn. The result: corn plants that
contain one of the Bt proteins that protect them from a
common crop-destroying pest, the European corn borer.
StarLink's Bt protein -- Cry9C -- is different: It is
slower to be digested in the human gut and is less easily
destroyed by cooking. While these characteristics are not
troublesome by themselves, they are common features of
proteins in peanuts and other foods that cause food
allergies in some people.
For that reason, the EPA two years ago approved the
Aventis corn only for non-human use.
Possible
violation
Stephen Johnson, EPA deputy assistant administrator for
pesticides, said Aventis may have violated its license for
using StarLink. ``They were supposed to have signed
agreements with all growers. They were supposed to have
all the bags appropriately labeled,'' he said. ``Now there
are some questions about whether that was done.''
Johnson said that government investigators recently
asked food producers to report any allegations of allergic
reaction to products that may be tainted with StarLink.
About 20 cases have been reported to date. In half of
them, Johnson said, the investigators have already been
able to rule out allergic reactions based on the medical
records of the patients.
About 2 percent of the population suffers from food
allergies, with such symptoms as hives, rashes, difficulty
breathing or intestinal upset.
As many as 200 individuals die each year from allergic
reactions, often to trace amounts of allergens.
Is the protein in StarLink corn one of those allergens?
``Unfortunately there are no shared properties of all
allergens,'' said Susan L. Hefle, co-director of the food
allergy research program at the University of Nebraska.
Qualified
assurance
Hefle, who reviewed StarLink as a consultant to
Aventis, concluded that while the data was inconclusive,
there was ``a low probability'' that the Bt protein would
cause allergies.
But that is not enough of an assurance to satisfy food
manufacturers, such as Mission Foods, a subsidiary of
Mexico's Gruma Corp. (Another Gruma subsidiary produced
the flour that went into the contaminated Taco Bell brand
shells.)
The contamination has also thrown the grain markets
into turmoil.
``If a grain operator finds one kernel of StarLink,
he's got to reject an entire load,'' said Michael J.
Phillips, executive director for food and agriculture at
the Biotechnology Industry Organization. ``We're going to
have litigation about this for some time.''
Phillips pointed out, however, that there is no
evidence to date that the protein from StarLink is present
in any of the products that have been recalled.
That is because there are no well-established tests for
the protein itself, according to the EPA's Johnson.
The agency, he said, is pushing Aventis and the food
industry to establish methods to detect the protein.
``In the meantime, we have to assume if the DNA is
present, the protein may be,'' Johnson said.
Corn
farmers should be all ears
Be careful of what you
plant next season, experts now warn
November 20
AP
PEORIA - Illinois farmers are getting early advice about
what corn to plant and what to avoid next spring in hopes
of preventing a repeat of this year's harvest controversy
over a genetically modified corn that slipped into the
human food supply.
Mishandling of the genetically modified StarLink corn
variety, which is approved only for animal feed, resulted
in large recalls of taco shells and some other foods
earlier this fall. Fears about the U.S. grain supply have
been blamed for recent drops in corn exports, and major
grain handlers and government agencies are still working
to segregate StarLink from corn headed to processing
plants.
In a letter sent this week, Decatur-based grain
processor A.E. Staley Manufacturing advises farmers to use
caution if planting genetically modified hybrids, making
sure they only plant those varieties approved for human
use by the European Union, which constitutes a major
market.
"Just as StarLink corn has changed our corn
purchasing operation this year to, among other things,
require testing, nothing can be assumed or taken for
granted as seed choices are made for spring
planting," the letter says. "The only truly safe
seed selection will be seed corn free of any genetic
modification."
Archer Daniels Midland Co., a major grain shipper and
processor also based in Decatur, did not go quite as far.
In a policy statement, the company said it supports
biotechnology developments in agriculture but must produce
products that will be accepted in overseas markets, which
ban some biotech products.
ADM officials say all their elevators that supply
processing plants will accept non-modified corn and
modified strains approved for human use worldwide. Certain
other varieties will be accepted only at designated
elevators; no StarLink will be accepted.
Advice is also coming from the Illinois Corn Growers
Association, which plans to begin distributing a 16-page
booklet next week listing what types of corn will be
accepted for different uses.
Doug Wilson, who farms near Gridley, said he's glad
processors are communicating with growers this early as
they begin deciding what to plant. In the past, he said,
advisories about preferred varieties often weren't issued
until producers had already bought seed corn and begun
planting.
"They're giving us a much better picture of what
they will and won't do. Now it will be a matter of how
well we heed what they say," he said.
"Everyone's got to protect themselves. If nothing
else, StarLink has brought it to the forefront that
there's huge liability issues."
The discovery that StarLink corn had commingled with
approved corn caused farmers and grain elevator operators
to worry that the controversial variety could ruin the
harvest even for those who had tried to avoid the grain.
But Doug Durdan, who runs Durdan Grain Elevator near
Streator, said assurances from StarLink manufacturer
Aventis CropScience that farmers and merchants will be
reimbursed for any losses have calmed those fears.
"It's been pretty minor," he said.
So far, the company has agreed to pay farmers 25 cents
per bushel over normal local prices for StarLink and
"buffer corn" — crops grown near the
genetically modified corn — but not commingled corn.
State attorneys general from 16 states, including
Illinois, are pushing the company to cover the cost of
corn that was commingled and now tests positive for
StarLink. They also want the company to speed up payments.
Just how much StarLink remains to be segregated from
Illinois stocks is a mystery. Mark Lambert, spokesman for
the state Corn Growers Association, said there's no doubt
that through commingling and cross-pollination in fields,
there is more StarLink than was produced on the 17,000
acres planted in the state.
Scherrie Giamanco, chief price support program
specialist for the Farm Service Agency in Illinois, said
that agency is directing anyone who thinks they have
StarLink to contact Aventis for information on where to
deliver it and apply for payment.
"It's a finite amount and for the most part it's
going to be tracked and contained," she said.
India
says no to genetically modified foods and seeds
November 20
XINHUA
Genetically modified seeds and food
would not be allowed into India till their safety is
scientifically proved, Agriculture Minister Nitish Kumar
said on Saturday. According to the Press Trust of India (PTI),
Kumar said in Calcutta, 1, 460 kilometers southeast of
here, that there is a lot of apprehension about
genetically modified seeds and food in the country.
"We can not allow import of things
which are not acceptable to the people. Let health and
environmental scientists decide how safe those are,"
the minister added while inaugurating a regional plant
quarantine center near Calcutta.
Declaring that the central government
has decided not to allow entry of "terminator"
seeds into the country, Kumar said that while his country
is aimed at becoming a superpower in bio- technology, the
concerns of the people must also be addressed.
Warning that there has been a
"globalization of pests," he called on Indian
scientists to remain vigilant to check the entry of
harmful exotic pests and germs into agricultural produce
of the country.
McDonald's
dumps GM-fed meat
November 19
BBC
Fast food chain McDonald's has promised not
to use meat reared on genetically modified (GM) feed.
McDonald's UK, which uses 30,000 tons of
beef every year, made the decision in response to public
concerns about the safety of the so-called
"Frankenstein" foods.
The company says around 2.5 million
people a day eat at one of its 1,100 restaurants in the
UK.
Some farmers use GM feed to increase the
muscle bulk of animals or improve their milk yield.
But anti-GM campaigners say the public
cannot be sure that meat fed on GM feed is safe and they
point to the BSE crisis as an example of complacency in
the meat industry.
A spokeswoman for the company said:
"McDonald's in the UK has taken the decision to move
away from the use of animal feed containing genetically
modified ingredients.
"We have therefore requested that
our suppliers seek non-GM sources of feed.
"Our chicken supplier already uses
feed containing soya meal of Brazilian origin, which is
principally non-GM.
"We are continuing to work with our
suppliers of beef, pork, eggs and dairy products to
identify sources of non-GM animal feed, although
sustainability remains a concern."
'Listening
to concerns'
She added: "We are listening to
concerns expressed by consumers seeking reassurances about
the safety of food produced in this way.
"We will continue to monitor public
opinion and scientific developments."
The giant US-owned burger chain made a
stand during the height of the BSE crisis by taking
British beef off the menu.
The McDonald's spokeswoman told BBC News
Online: "We don't use any GM products or ingredients
in our meals and it is a natural extension of that policy
not to use GM feeds."
She said it was almost impossible to
guarantee all animal feed was free of GM ingredients but
said this was an "industry wide" problem.
The use of GM animal feed is governed by
European Union legislation.
Eleven GM varieties of maize are authorized
for use in feed in the United States but only four of
these may be legally used in the EU.
But there is even a difference in
interpretation of the EU legislation.
Britain and Holland say the use of US
maize gluten feed is not governed by the GM regulations
but its importation and use is banned in France.
'No
hint of a problem'
A spokesman for the pro-GM pressure
group, CropGen, said: "GM ingredients are considered
safe for human, never mind animal consumption and they
continue to be used in many parts of the world, as they
have been for several years, without a hint of a
problem."
He said: "The argument of the
pressure groups is that meat from an animal fed on GM
products is in some way different from that of an animal
fed on non-GM products, or that the meat itself should be
considered as GM. This is simply untrue.
"The genes and proteins introduced
into a crop by GM meet the same fate when the crop is
eaten as the tens of thousands of other genes and proteins
present in the crop - they are destroyed in the
stomach."
Indian
Center says no to genetically modified food till proved
safe
November 19
Times of India
CALCUTTA - Union agriculture minister Nitish Kumar on
Saturday asserted that genetically-modified seeds and food
would not be allowed into the country till their safety
was scientifically proved.
"There is a lot of apprehension in the country
about genetically-modified seeds and food. We cannot allow
import of things which are not acceptable to the people.
Let health and environmental scientists decide how safe
those are," Kumar said while inaugurating the
Regional Plant Quarantine Center (RPQC) at Salt Lake near
here.
Stating that the Center had decided not to allow entry
of 'Terminator' seeds into the country, he said while
India aimed at becoming a superpower in bio-technology,
the concerns of the people must also be addressed.
Warning that there had been a 'globalization of pests,'
he called upon RPQC scientists to remain vigilant to check
the entry of harmful exotic pests and germs into the
country's agricultural produce.
The Rs 4.14 crore RPQC, the third after those in
Chennai and New Delhi, has been implemented by the union
agriculture ministry with funds from undp and consultancy
from the FAO.
Provided with latest equipment, it would serve
quarantine inspection purposes for export and import of
plants and seeds in West Bengal, besides the Eastern and
North-Eastern states.
Dirty
tricks call as defector flies to GM inquiry
November 19
New Zealand Herald
A former founder of Greenpeace who has since become a
vocal critic of environmentalists is being paid to come to
New Zealand to testify before the Royal Commission on
Genetic Modification.
Greenpeace is accusing the pro-GE Life Sciences Network
of using "dirty tactics" by flying Dr Patrick
Moore from Canada to appear before the commission this
month.
"Moore has no credibility in respect of genetic
engineering," said Greenpeace spokeswoman Annette
Cotter.
"The sole purpose in bringing him here seems to be
to paint the environmental movement in an unsavory
light."
After almost 10 years at the forefront of high-profile
Greenpeace campaigns on whaling and sealing, Dr Moore
defected to become an outspoken supporter of clearfelling
forests in British Columbia.
He has so enraged environmental groups that they have
devoted a website to him, which includes personal attacks.
Dr Moore left Greenpeace in 1984 after what the organization
calls "internal disagreements," and set up an
alternative environmental group called Greenspirit.
The 53-year-old has said the GE debate is being
influenced by "pagan beliefs and junk science,"
and believes the tide is turning against the
"anti-science extremist element" among
environmentalists.
Life Sciences executive director Francis Wevers
defended bringing Dr Moore here by saying the GE debate
was not just about science.
"It's an ethical issue, it's an economic issue . .
. and Patrick Moore has been saying important things about
this debate for a long time."
The network, an umbrella organization of at least 30
industry and science groups that support genetic
engineering, was paying airfares, accommodation and
"a very small grant" to bring nine overseas
witnesses here, Mr Wevers said.
"You can't expect people to take that sort of time
and not pay them something."
The organization's budget for the hearings was
"internal information," he said.
Network membership cost $3500 a year.
Ms Cotter said Life Sciences was "throwing huge
resources and time" into the hearings.
"It seems the burden of proof is on the anti-GE
groups. There's no way we can compete with the kind of
resources they have," she said.
Greenpeace was bringing four expert witnesses from
overseas and was paying airfares and accommodation for
three of them.
The commission has been asked by the Government to
investigate where New Zealand should stand on genetic
technology and must deliver its report by next June.
ConAgra
recalled 1.45 mln lbs flour linked to bio-corn
November 17
Reuters
A U.S. food recall linked to StarLink bio-tech corn has
broadened to include 1.45 million pounds of baking
ingredients made by the nation's second-largest food
manufacturer, the Food and Drug Administration said.
ConAgra Foods Inc recalled 25- and 100-pound bags of
corn flour, grits, polenta, cornmeal and binders used by
restaurants and institutions.
The company quietly began the recall in October, but
this was not made public until the FDA published a weekly
notice on Wednesday of all U.S. food recalls underway.
ConAgra said it did not consider the action a recall
because none of the institutional-sized bags of flour ever
reached stores where consumers could buy it.
``We're saying it was a voluntary market withdrawal,''
a ConAgra spokeswoman said. ``All the food was
retrieved.''
The products were recalled because they may contain
traces of StarLink corn, a variety not allowed in human
food because of concerns it might cause allergic reactions
in people. In 1998, the Environmental Protection Agency
approved StarLink for use only in animal feed.
The items were milled at ConAgra's facility in
Atchison, Kansas. ``Everything listed on the notice comes
to less than one day's production at the mill,'' the
spokeswoman said.
The discovery of StarLink in taco shells in late
September triggered a recall of more than 300 kinds of
U.S.-made chips, tostados and other snack foods made with
corn flour. Food processors have been forced to begin
testing raw ingredients to determine if any StarLink is
present in supplies.
The ConAgra plant in Kansas that made the recalled
items was closed for more than a week in October for
thorough cleaning and tests after StarLink was detected
there. Several other U.S. food processors also were forced
to temporarily shut down production lines last month to
check for StarLink.
The recalled items included the following:
- Cahokia Pride Yellow Corn Meal, packaged in 25-lb.
bags coded 09/29/00.
- Dixianna Enriched Yellow Cornmeal, packaged in 25
lb. bags coded 09/29/00.
- ConAgra Corn Meal 116C, 100-lb. bags coded 10/03/00.
- USA Cornmeal Yellow Enriched, Degermed, packaged in
25-kg. bags coded Lot 910, labeled Contract No.
VEPD02706/
- Sysco Classic Yellow Corn Meal, packaged in plain
brown 25-lb. bags coded 09/29/00.
- ConAgra Corn Flour 110, packaged in 50-lb. and
100-lb. bags coded 09/29/00.
- ConAgra Snack Meal 128 Enr, packaged in 50-lb. bags
coded 09/30/00.
- ConAgra Snack Meal 128, packaged in 50-lb. bags
coded 09/30/00.
- Alberto A-1 Coarse Cornmeal Polenta Grits 95B,
packaged in 50-lb. bags coded 09/29/00 and 10/01/00.
- Bulk Pregel/cereal binder, product #201.
The FDA said the amounts recalled totaled 219,854
pounds of corn meal; 416,780 pounds of corn flour; 106,250
pounds of snack meal; 435,500 pounds of flaking grits;
135,000 pounds of polenta grits; and 137,100 pounds of
cereal binder.
Paraguay
adopts GM labeling
November 17
JustFood.com
Brazil's rejection of a shipment of
Paraguayan corn on suspicion that it contained some GM
corn has led Paraguay to adopt a labeling program for its
corn and cereal exports.
Paraguayan producers can ill afford to
lose access to the Brazilian market, which accounts for
roughly 50% of foreign corn sales.
Paraguay's four leading corn and cereal
exporting companies have contracted the French company SGS
to handle the labeling. The labeling companies are
responsible for inspecting all shipments and to certify
that “GM free” shipments are in fact just that.
Implementation of the labeling plan should be well
underway by the end of this year and growers are
optimistic that it will avoid any downturn in export
sales.
|