|
Initiatives
City,
County and State Initiatives can be used by citizens
to force a public vote on an issue. If the Initiative
gets enough public support by signatures of registered
voters, the Initiative becomes a "Measure"
on the ballot. (There is another type of Initiative
in some states that can force the state legislature
to vote on an issue.)
If the Measure passes, it becomes law, as
long as it is not in conflict with other local, state
or federal laws. If the legality is challenged, the
courts decide which law has authority.
| Measure
27, Oregon 2002
An
initiative to require the labeling of genetically
engineered food sold in the state of Oregon
The opposition spent $5.4 million
to defeat Measure 27 in the 2002 election in Oregon.
They misinformed people that their grocery bills
would double if Measure 27 passed and spent millions
of dollars on television, radio and newspaper
ads. Plus, opponents direct-mailed voters with
literature that contained misleading charts projecting
how much grocery prices would go up if Measure
27 was passed.
Since the supporters of Measure
27 had relatively little money to spend on advertising
to counter the charges of the opponents, voters
in Oregon did not pass it into law.
The Campaign built the Measure 27
web site and pays the hosting fees to keep it
live since it contains a lot of worthwhile information.
The address of the web site is: http://www.voteyeson27.com
Measure 27 taught us one important
lesson: don't try to pass state Initiatives unless
you have millions of dollars to spend promoting
passage of the Measure.
City and County Initiatives are
a much smarter strategic approach. They cost less
money and the opposition has a harder time "buying
the election" with large budgets.
However, recently there have been
laws passed in 14 states that eliminate the use
of Initiatives as a means to ban biotech crops
from cities and counties. So City and County Resolutions
are another method supporters of labeling should
consider as an effective alternative.
Posted below is information about
some successful county Initiatives that have been
passed into law in California. |
Measure
H, the Mendocino ordinance:
When
Mendocino County citizens voted on March 2, 2004 to
pass Measure H, a ban the growing or raising of genetically
engineered crops and animals there, it set in motion
a series of efforts in other California counties to
ban genetically altered crops as well.
Trinity
County officials in August 2004 banned the growing or
raising of genetically engineered crops or animals.
And
in November 2004, Marin county approved a ban on the
growth of biotech crops.
Posted
below are the Mendocino and Marin Measures that have
been passed into law.
MEASURE
H, MENDOCINO COUNTY
Section
1. Finding. The people of Mendocino County
wish to protect the county’s agriculture, environment,
economy, and private property from genetic pollution
by genetically modified organisms.
Section
2. Prohibition. It shall be unlawful for any
person, firm, or corporation to propagate, cultivate,
raise, or grow genetically modified organisms in Mendocino
County.
Section
3. Definitions.
(a) Genetically modified organisms means specific organisms
whose native intrinsic DNA has been intentionally altered
or amended with non species specific DNA. For purposes
of this ordinance, genetic modification does not include
organisms created by traditional breeding or hybridization,
or to microorganisms created by moving genes or gene
segments between unrelated bacteria.
(b) DNA or deoxyribonucleic acid means a complex protein
that is present in every cell of an organism and is
the ‘blueprint’ for the organism’s
development.
(c) Organism means any living thing.
(d) Agricultural Commissioner means the Agricultural
Commissioner of Mendocino County.
Section
4. Penalties.
(a) The Agricultural Commissioner shall notify any person,
firm, or corporation that may be in violation of Section
2 of this Ordinance, that any organisms in violation
of this Ordinance are subject to confiscation and destruction.
(b) Any person, firm, or corporation that receives notification
under subparagraph (a) shall have five (5) days to respond
to such notification with evidence that such organisms
are not in violation of this Ordinance.
(c) Upon receipt of any evidence under paragraph (b),
the Agricultural Commissioner shall consider such evidence
and any other evidence that is presented or which is
relevant to a determination of such violation. The Agricultural
Commissioner shall make such determination as soon as
possible, but at least before any genetic pollution
may occur.
(d) Upon making a determination that a violation of
this Ordinance exists, the Agricultural Commissioner
shall cause to be confiscated and destroyed any such
organisms that are in violation of this Ordinance before
any genetic pollution may occur.
(e) If the Agricultural Commissioner determines there
has been a violation of this Ordinance, in addition
to confiscation and destruction of any organisms that
are found to be in violation, the Agricultural Commissioner
shall impose a monetary penalty on the person, firm,
or corporation responsible for the violation, taking
into account the amount of damage, any potential damage,
and the willfulness of the person, firm, or corporation.
MEASURE
B, MARIN COUNTY
THE
PEOPLE OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
MARIN COUNTY ORDINANCE PROHIBITING GROWING
OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
Section 1. Findings and Purpose. The People
of the County of Marin, desiring to protect our agricultural
industry, our natural environment, the private property
rights of our citizens, and the health, safety and welfare
of our People, deem it advisable and appropriate to
restrict the cultivation of genetically modified crops,
livestock, and other organisms in our County.
a. Genetically modified life forms and products are
being developed with precipitous speed, and have been
introduced into the marketplace, often without the consumers'
knowledge and before the potential risks and long term
health and environmental effects of these products have
been adequately studied.
b. Many companies and markets do not accept genetically
modified food products. Further, the irreversible danger
of contaminating and thereby reducing the value of neighboring
crops by genetically engineered crops, creates a serious
economic threat to farmers. Finally, the impact on our
natural environment from genetically modified organisms,
including pollen drift and contamination (GMO pollen
can be carried a long distance by migrating and commuting
pollinators), is unpredictable, uncontrollable, and
has not received adequate study.
c. The Natural Systems Element, Agriculture and Food
Section, for the 2004 Marin Countywide Plan supports
sustainable agriculture and recommends a positive vision
for the future of food and farming in our county including
greatly improved agricultural viability.
d. For all of these reasons, the People of County of
Marin find and declare that the propagation, cultivation,
raising, and growing of genetically modified organisms
in Marin County is a hazardous activity which constitutes
a public nuisance subject to the abatement remedies
and procedures set forth under Chapter 1.05 of the Marin
County Code.
Section 2. Prohibitions. It is unlawful for
any person or entity to propagate, cultivate, raise,
or grow genetically modified organisms in Marin County,
and any act in violation of this provision is declared
to constitute a public nuisance.
Section 3. Exemptions. Nothing in this
Ordinance shall make it unlawful for (1) state or federally
licensed: medical research institutions, medical laboratories,
or medical manufacturing facilities to engage in licensed
medical production, or medical research involving genetically
modified organisms provided such activities are conducted
under secure, enclosed indoor laboratory conditions,
with utmost precautions to prevent release of genetically
modified organisms into the outside environment, or
(2) any licensed health care practitioner to provide
any diagnosis, care or treatment to any human patient.
Section 4. Definitions.
(a) "Genetically modified organism" ("GMO")
means an organism, or the
offspring of an organism, the DNA of which has been
altered or amended through genetic engineering.
(b) "Genetic engineering" means altering or
amending DNA using recombinant DNA technology such as
gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign
gene, or changing the position of genes, and includes
cell fusion, microencapsulation, macroencapsulation,
gene splicing, and other similar processes. Genetic
engineering does not include traditional selective breeding,
conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization,
non-directed mutagenesis or tissue culture.
(c) "DNA" means deoxyribonucleic acid, the
material naturally found within living cells which contains
the genetic code and transmits hereditary patterns.
(d) "Organism" means any living thing, exclusive
of human beings and human fetuses.
(e) "Commissioner" means the Agricultural
Commissioner of Marin County.
(f) "Person" or "entity" means an
individual, partnership, corporation, governmental agency
or organization of any kind.
(g) "Indoors" means within a structure meeting
the Requirements of the 2001 California Building Code,
Section 304 for Group B Occupancies and a minimum of
"Type III" construction.
Section 5. Enforcement.
(a) The Marin County Agricultural Commissioner is hereby
designated to enforce this Ordinance and may exercise
such powers as may be necessary or convenient to carry
out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of this
Ordinance.
(b) The Agricultural Commissioner shall notify any person,
corporation, or other entity that may be in violation
of Section 2 of this Code section, that any organisms
that violate this code constitute a public nuisance,
subject to confiscation, destruction or quarantine and
subject to the nuisance abatement penalties and procedures
set forth under Chapter 1.05 of the Marin County Code.
(c) Any person, corporation, or other entity that receives
notification under subparagraph (b) shall have fifteen
(15) days to respond to such notification with evidence
that such organisms are not in violation of this Code,
or have been destroyed or entirely removed from Marin
County.
(d) Upon receipt of any evidence under subparagraph
(c), the Agricultural Commissioner shall consider such
evidence and any other evidence that is presented or
which is relevant to a determination of such violation.
Within five (5) days of receipt of such evidence, the
Agricultural Commissioner shall determine if the organisms
are in violation of this code, or have been destroyed
or removed.
(e) Upon making a determination that a violation of
this code exists, or if no evidence has been submitted
pursuant to subparagraph (c), upon reasonable notice,
the Agricultural Commissioner shall thereafter promptly
take all actions necessary to ensure that such organisms
do not cause genetic contamination or other harm, including
but not limited to the following: confiscation, destruction
or quarantine. Such action shall be undertaken during
daylight hours.
(f) Either the party effected by the enforcement or
the Agricultural Commissioner may thereafter request
a hearing provided such request is made in writing within
thirty days thereafter. The hearing shall be held in
accordance with the nuisance abatement procedures under
Chapter 1.05 of the Marin County Code. Violation of
Section 2 of this code is not entitled to the privileges
and immunities set forth under section 23.03.040 of
the Marin County Code exempting pre-existing agricultural
activity from nuisance abatement.
(g) Any person or persons knowingly and willfully responsible
for a violation of this Ordinance may be held responsible
for administrative and abatement costs. Costs of enforcement
shall not be imposed upon any person whose violation
is not knowing and willful, nor shall costs be imposed
for enforcement for crops planted or animals possessed
in the County prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
The County Agricultural Commissioner shall submit an
annual report to the Marin County Board of Supervisors
which describes all complaints received and enforcement
actions taken under this Ordinance.
(h) The provisions of this Ordinance are cumulative,
and nothing in this Ordinance affects any other remedies
any individual or government entity may have against
any person resulting from a violation of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Severability. The provisions of
this Ordinance are severable. If any provision of this
Ordinance or its application is held invalid, that invalidity
shall not affect other provisions or applications that
can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application.
Measure M Failed in Sonoma County, California on November
8, 2005.

If
Measure M had passed, it would have done the following:
- Would
have placed a 10-year moratorium on the production
of genetically engineered organisms
- Would
not have restricted any drugs or vaccines for humans
or animals
- Would
have assured that violators, not the taxpayer, pay
for the costs
- Would
have protected the environment and farms from genetic
contamination
Click
here to read Measure M
To
keep informed on efforts to introduce anther initiative,
please contact GE FREE Sonoma County at (707) 823-4410
or visit their web site at www.gefreesonoma.org
For
Further Information:
GMO
Free Mendocino
Grow
GMO free: Humboldt County
GMO
Free Marin
GE-free
Sonoma County
GMO
Free Alameda County
GE-Free
Butte
SLO
GE Free -- San Luis Obispo County
BioDemocracy
Alliance
Californians
for GE-Free Agriculture
|