Join Us!
Member Login
The Campaign Forums
 
 
 
Search Web Site

 
 
Home Return
Label Geneticaly Engineered Foods
Save Organic Food
Regulate PharmCrops
No GMO Rice
Action Alerts
Find An Activist
Tell Your Friends
 

GE Foods Tutorial

Pesticidal potatoes, terminator seeds and genetically mutated trees, oh my!

The world of biotechnology is filled with harrowing tales of strange, new "Frankenfoods." If it's bizarre, genetic engineers can create it! Here are just a few of their frightening creations:

1. Pesticidal potatoes
potatoFor years, many chemical companies made a lot of money by selling pesticides to spray on crops. These days, the game is changing: Genetic engineers have created potatoes that actually can produce their own pesticides.

The New Leaf Superior, marketed by the Monsanto corporation since 1995, is engineered to produce the insecticide Bt, or Bacillus thuringiensis, in each one of its cells. Bt kills the Colorado potato beetle, one of the biggest threats to healthy potatoes.

Unfortunately, the pesticidal potatoes are not labeled, so unless you consume only organic potatoes, there's no way to be sure that you're not eating the pesticidal variety. And some scientists say that the long-term effects of eating these potatoes is unknown.

In 1998, the New York Times reported that regulation of the pesticidal potato has fallen through the cracks of the U.S. government. The Food and Drug Administration told the Times it does not regulate the potato because it does not have the authority to regulate pesticides; that responsibility, said the FDA, lies with the Environmental Protection Agency. But the EPA said labeling pesticidal potatoes is FDA's job, because potatoes are a food. The FDA responded that the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act forbids the food agency from including information about pesticides on foods. And so it goes.

Meanwhile, Phil Angell, Monsanto's director of corporate communications, told the Times that "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job."

2. Terminator seeds
Monsanto also has developed a new seed technology that has many environmentalists and Third World leaders crying foul.

The "terminator seed," still in developmental stages, is designed to produce sterile crops that don't produce seeds. Under the new technology, Monsanto would force farmers to buy seeds from the giant agribusiness every year. Historically, farmers have saved some seeds from one growing season for use in the next.

Environmentalists worry what will happen when the terminator is unleashed on the environment. They fear that terminator technology could migrate from one farm to another, or from a farm to wild plants.

And activists in developing nations, who say that up to 1.4 billion farming families worldwide may be forced to buy the seed, say the technology would put too much power in the hands of a few international agribusinesses.

"It's terribly dangerous," says Hope Shand, of the Rural Advancement Foundation International, a Canadian group. "Half the world's farmers are poor and can't afford to buy seed every growing season. Yet they grow 15 to 20 percent of the world's food."

Responding to the intense criticisms, Monsanto announced in 1999 that it would not commercialize the terminator seed. However, the company continues to research several related technologies, and could change its mind about the terminator down the road.

3. Genetically mutated trees
Genetic engineering is a field that extends into many areas beyond food. One of the more frightening images to arise so far is that of the genetically mutated forest.

Tree of deathScientists say that plans for "terminator" trees --engineered never to flower--could create a "silent spring" in the forests. While these trees would grow faster than traditional trees, they would be lifeless in comparison. Gone would be the bees, butterflies, moths, birds and squirrels that depend on pollen, seed and nectar of normally reproducing trees.

Monsanto has developed plans with the New Zealand Forest Research Agency to create sterile plantations of trees. These terminator trees, in addition to being non-reproducing, would be engineered to secrete toxic chemicals through their leaves that would kill caterpillars and other insects that eat leaves. The trees would also be designed to be herbicide-resistant, meaning that tree farmers could use increased quantities of herbicides to wipe out ground flora.

"If you replace vast tracts of natural forest with flowerless trees, there will be a serious effect on the richness and abundance of insects," says George McGavin, curator of entomology at Oxford University Museum. "If you put insect resistance in the leaves as well you will end up with nothing but booklice and earwigs. We are talking about vast tracts of land covered with plants that do not support animal life as a sterile means of culturing wood tissue. That is a pretty unattractive vision of the future and one I want no part of."

4. Scientists create glow-in-the-dark potato
Edinburgh scientists have mixed jellyfish genes with potatoes, resulting in spuds that glow when they need watering. The potatoes are not intended for consumption; only a few would be planted per hectare for water monitoring purposes. But ecologists wonder what will happen if the potatoes get mixed in with the regular batch.

5. "Edible vaccines" and other medical uses of foods
Genetic engineers plan on creating "edible vaccines" by inserting vaccines in bananas, potatoes and other fruits and vegetables against diseases such as hepatitis, cholera and malaria. But some scientists aren't sure what impact eating large quantities of these foods will have on young children in developing countries.

Fruits and vegetables are also being designed to offer higher levels of anti-oxidant vitamins, vitamin A and others. Biotechnology firms say these efforts will help improve peoples' health.

But some of these companies are the same ones that developed pesticides such as DDT, which have been shown to have devastating effects on human development and wildlife. Can we really trust these companies to get it right this time?

Previous

Next