Join Us!
Member Login
The Campaign Forums
 
 
 
Search Web Site

 
 
Home Return
Label Geneticaly Engineered Foods
Save Organic Food
Regulate PharmCrops
No GMO Rice
Action Alerts
Find An Activist
Tell Your Friends
 

GE Foods Tutorial

Threats to the environment

When biotech corporations boast that genetic engineering can do wonders for the environment, we would do well to consider the source. After all, some of these companies are the same ones that have invented such deadly pesticides such as DDT and Agent Orange. These pesticides, it was promised, would help the environment; instead, they turned into environmental disasters.

Environmentalists have many concerns about GE foods. Here are a few:

1. The plight of the Monarch butterfly
Cornell University researchers have found that GE corn may be deadly to the Monarch butterfly. In laboratory tests in the spring of 1999, the scientists found that nearly half of monarch butterflyMonarch caterpillars that ate milkweed leaves dusted with GE corn pollen died within four days. The surviving Monarchs that ate the genetically mutated corn pollen were much smaller and had smaller appetites than the control Monarchs, which ate normal corn pollen or no pollen at all.

In 2000, Iowa State University scientists found that plants growing in and near cornfields are being dusted with enough GE pollen to kill monarch caterpillars that feed on them.

Already, GE corn is being grown on 20 million acres of American farmland, right in the heart of Monarch's migratory route between Mexico and Canada.

And scientists worry that there may be additional surprising scientific discoveries down the road.

2. Increased pesticide pollution
Many of the new GE crops, such as Roundup Ready soybeans, are designed to allow farmers to spray heavier doses of pesticides on their land. These pesticides inevitably will find their way into our water and food supply, endangering humans and wildlife.

New Scientist magazine reports that many farmers that have converted to GE production use as many pesticides as their conventional counterparts, while some GE farmers now use more pesticides.

And one of Britain's leading safety experts, Malcolm Kane (former head of food safety at the supermarket chain Sainsbury's), has revealed that the limits on pesticide residues in soy had been increased 200-fold to help the GE industry. He warned that higher pesticide residues could appear in a wide variety of foods, ranging from breakfast cereals to biscuits.

3. Genetic contamination of the environment
When Scottish Parliament member Robin Harper learned that Scottish scientists were experimenting with genetically modified salmon that grow at four times the normal rate, he was horrified, and called for a ban on all genetic engineering experiments.

"We should be extremely concerned about genetically modified fish because of the danger that they could escape into the wild," he said. "It's a similar, if not even more dangerous threat, to that we are facing with GM plants. If a GM fish escaped or was released accidentally in to the wild it could never be recaptured. This fish could breed with wild populations and devastate fishthe existing natural balance with its modified behavior.

"There can be no doubt as to the huge threat GM fish would be to fish stocks wherever they were released in the World's oceans. This fish, if it escaped into the North Atlantic, could do untold damage to the ecology both of the north Atlantic and Scottish salmon rivers."

Like Harper, many scientists are concerned about the widespread release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment. In the United States, millions of acres of land have been planted with GE crops. Scientists fear that GMOs will be spread, by bird, insect or wind, to non-GE crops--and to the wilderness. And unlike other kinds of waste, genetic contamination cannot be cleaned up, or contained.

4. GE genes can jump species barrier
In May, 2000, Professor Hans-Hinrich Katz, a leading German zoologist, released research that shows that genes used to modify crops can jump to other species and cause bacteria to mutate. Katz found that the gene used to modify oilseed rape had transferred to bacteria living in the guts of honey bees.

"These findings are very worrying and provide the first real evidence of what many have feared," says prominent genetic engineering critic and scientist Dr. Mae-Wan Ho.

"Everybody is keen to exploit GM technology, but nobody is looking at the risk of horizontal gene transfer. We are playing about with genetic structures that existed for millions of years and the experiment is running out of control."

5. Herbicide resistance and fears of the rise of superweeds
Some scientists fear that the extensive planting of genetically engineered crops will lead to a new class of "superweeds" that are resistant to pesticides. The largest class of genetic engineered foods is pesticide-resistant crops, such as Roundup Ready soybeans. The problem is that newly created transgenes may be spread unintentionally--by bird, insect or wind--from target crops to related weed species. The weeds then also pick up resistance to the pesticide.

Nature magazine reported in 1996, for example, that herbicide-resistant GE oilseed rape, released in Europe, has spread to several wild relatives.

6. Risks to biodiversity
In one especially macabre application of GE technology, scientists seek to develop "terminator" tree farms. The trees would be forestengineered not to reproduce, and they would be designed to secrete toxic chemicals through their leaves that would kill leaf-eating insects. The trees also would be engineered to include pesticide resistance, meaning that ground flora could be wiped out easily. Critics say the trees might grow faster than before, but they'd be devoid of bees, butterflies, birds and squirrels that depend on pollen, seed and nectar.

The terminator tree farms highlight a growing concern among scientists: the threat genetically engineered crops pose to biodiversity. Scientists estimate that by the year 2000, the world will have lost 95 percent of the genetic diversity present in agriculture 100 years earlier. GE crops are developed from the same monoculture varieties that giant agribusinesses have planted in the latter half of this century, and will only exacerbate the problem.

Moreover, pesticide-resistant crops will allow the application of increasing amounts of powerful pesticides. These pesticides often kill more than the targeted weeds; they frequently kill beneficial plants outside their intended range.

7. Damage to the soil
Scientists are concerned that genetically mutated crops may damage the soil. Researchers for Nature magazine reported in December that some types of GE crops may be leaking powerful toxins into the soil.

Many GE crops, such as corn and potatoes, have been engineered to produce poisons or toxins to fight pests that eat their leaves and stems. Researchers fear that beneficial soil organisms also may be killed, and that some insects may become resistant to the toxins.

Other researchers have revealed that lacewings that ate corn borers reared on GE corn had also died, increasing speculation that these crops are harming beneficial organisms.

8. Genetically engineered crops put birds at risk
British researchers in 2000 reported that the use of genetically engineered crops modified to tolerate herbicides may severely cut bird populations on farms. Professor Andrew Watkinson and colleagues from the University of East Anglia in Norwich found that bird populations could decline as much as 90 percent in some areas where herbicide-tolerant crops have been sown.

9. The problem of unintended consequences
Biotech firms assure us there's nothing to worry about. Genetically engineered foods, they say, will save the environment.

But it's a story we've heard before. In the mid-1900s, giant agribusinesses took the biological and chemical weapons from two world wars and turned them into pesticides and herbicides. They promised a wondrous new agricultural era of bigger yields and bug-free produce. It was only decades afterwards that scientists began to realize the scope of the environmental devastation wrought by the explosive growth of the pesticide industry.

In the 1960s, scientist Rachel Carson's epic, Silent Spring, awakened a generation to the dangers of dioxin and other manmade chemicals in the environment. But it wasn't until 30 years later that scientists began to understand the extent of the problem. Now we know that pesticides and other manmade chemicals are tampering with sexual development and reproduction, in many animal populations and humans as well.

The discovery that genetically engineered corn might be deadly to Monarch butterflies came as a shock to biotech advocates. If biotech companies continue with their massive experiment, what will our scientists tell us 50 years from now?

Previous

Next